University of London internal review refuses to name Tsai Ing-wen thesis examiners claiming Privacy Act exemption from public disclosure

Screenshot (240)
Tsai Ing-wen’s 1984 London School of Economics thesis and Rosalind Frendo, Secretary of the Board of the University of London, who refuses to name the thesis examiners. (credits: Hwan Lin/University of London)

Following a six-week internal review by the University of London, the identity of Republic of China in-exile President Tsai Ing-wen’s thesis examiners will remain off-limits to the public. Rosalind Frendo, Director of Compliance and Secretary to the Board upheld the earlier decision of Kit Good, Data Protection and Information Compliance Manager, that the Privacy Act exempted such information from public disclosure. Frendo called the identification of university examiners “personal data” and denied a Freedom of Information request.

The identity of Tsai’s London School of Economics thesis examiners was called into question last year after Tsai belatedly submitted her 1984 thesis, thirty-five years late. However, the thesis submitted last summer to the LSE Library was not a finished, signed thesis. Instead, the tardy thesis entitled Unfair Trade Practices and Safeguard Actions appears to be a draft document patching together several separate papers.

Tsai has not named the thesis examiners but has written in a memoir they were so impressed they wanted to give her a double degree. The London School of Economicsdeclined to identify the thesis examiners but stated they conducted a “viva” with Tsai on October 16, 1983. Inexplicably, the viva date was a Sunday, an uncommon day for such a review. When pressed on the matter, Rachael Maguire, Information and Records Manager, directed all further inquiries to the LSE parent body, the University of London. After an initial denial of the identities by the University, Rosalind Frendo undertook an internal review of the matter.

Frendo will not talk about the thesis except to explain why the names of the examiners are exempt from public disclosure. Frendo wrote, “The University does consider that the information—which comprises part of a student record—is personal data.”

“Students will have a high expectation that records of their registration and the attendance at the University, which may reference a number of factors relating to their professional and personal life, would not be subject to public disclosure. Even in the case of a PhD thesis, where there is an expectation that the thesis would be publicly available, there is no expectation that further records of the assessment would be disclosed.”

“I believe, in this case, the legitimate interests of a third party do not outweigh the rights of the data subjects in the disclosure of further detail from the student’s record.”

“I do not believe that the requirements for transparency outweighs the privacy of individuals in the context of this request.”

“I have reviewed the request and conclude that the University was correct to take this position, which is a default position it holds for all its students and alumni. I have then gone on to assess the engagement of the exemption and find that the University has taken a reasonable position in its response.”

The academic controversy surrounding Tsai’s thesis has dropped from the news although it continues to be debated in the social media. Frendo’s decision that the thesis examiners will not be identified is likely to renew charges of critics that Tsai did not actually earn her degree and that the University of London is covering up an embarrassing mistake.

Author: richardsonreports

Author of FRAMED: J. Edgar Hoover, COINTELPRO & the Omaha Two Story.

6 thoughts on “University of London internal review refuses to name Tsai Ing-wen thesis examiners claiming Privacy Act exemption from public disclosure”

  1. The thesis examiners did not exist before ~ this could be the reason why LSE refused to disclose them. Probably a ‘cover up’ rather than privacy!

    Like

  2. Agree. Yes, it’s very shameful, but not surprising. In my recall, DPP was established by a ROC/KMT lawmaker named Fei Jen-Ching probably during 1970s, when Chiang Jr. was still alive. DPP leaders are schooled and trained by KMT. However, KMT has prepared a next generation leader, named Lin Fai-Fan, who is studying his PhD in the USA after finishing his training in UK. He arose from the Sun-Flower student movement in Taiwan, supposedly a smart guy, and hopefully can finish his degree without too much help. KMT circle said Lin was LDH’s biological son and inherited all of Lee’s political assets.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s