United Kingdom Information Commissioner has accepted complaint against University of London over Tsai Ing-wen thesis secrecy

Screenshot (267)
Tsai Ing-wen, President of the Republic of China in-exile, and Elizabeth Denham, Information Commissioner for the United Kingdom. Denham will be reviewing privacy claims made by the University of London over Tsai’s controversial 1984 London School of Economics thesis. (credits: Voice of America/Euroforum)

Another hurdle has been cleared in the effort to penetrate the shroud of secrecy imposed by the University of London over Tsai Ing-wen’s controversial 1984 graduate thesis. The London School of Economics thesis was filed by Tsai with the LSE Library in 2019, thirty-five years late. The tardy filing of what appears to be a draft document triggered an academic firestorm in Taiwan with numerous scholars questioning the validity of Tsai’s PhD degree.

Pam Clements, Group Manager at the Information Commissioner’s Office of the United Kingdom, confirmed the office has accepted my complaint that a privacy exemption from disclosure was improperly applied by the University of London. “Your complaint has been accepted as eligible for further consideration and will be allocated to a case officer as soon as possible.” The case officer will oversee the ICO investigation.

Clements elaborated, “Generally we deal with complaints in the order we receive them, except where we have identified a complaint that can be resolved quickly or there is a compelling reason for a case to be accelerated.”

The London School of Economics has claimed Tsai’s thesis was reviewed at a “viva” on October 16, 1983. The school did not explain why the viva was held on a Sunday and has not named the thesis examiners who passed Tsai. A Freedom of Information request to the parent University of London led to a six-week internal review which concluded the public was not entitled to know the identity of the thesis examiners as the information was considered to be part of a student record.

In defending the privacy exemption, Roselind Frendo, Secretary to the Board, failed to cite any precedent of support for the decision to avoid public disclosure of the thesis examiners’ identities. Frendo wrote, “Even in the case of a PhD thesis, where there is an expectation that the thesis would be publicly available, there is no expectation that further records of the assessment would be disclosed.”

“I believe, in this case, the legitimate interests of a third party do not outweigh the rights of the data subjects in the disclosure of further detail from the student’s record.”

Elizabeth Denham, the Information Commissioner, has made her career one of public disclosure. Denham can be expected to give the University of London refusal to name the thesis examiners a hard look.

Some of Tsai’s academic critics back home in Taiwan speculate that the real reason the University of London has not named the thesis examiners is because they do not exist. It is hard to see how the identity of thesis examiners is different from teachers, advisers, and administrators in the University degree process, while the need for secrecy about Tsai’s examiners remains unexplained.

Author: richardsonreports

Author of FRAMED: J. Edgar Hoover, COINTELPRO & the Omaha Two Story.

12 thoughts on “United Kingdom Information Commissioner has accepted complaint against University of London over Tsai Ing-wen thesis secrecy”

  1. It would be interesting to see what would be the final outcome of this review. To be fair, academic cheating is certainly not something new, but this does not make it right.


  2. We applaud the decision of the Commissioner. Transparency is the best way to subside all the prevailing speculation on Tsai’s PhD and defend LSE reputation which has been questioned for sometime already over this part of world.


  3. This is an excellent news, we are anxious to know the answer. It is extremely difficult to investigate this matter in Taiwan, Tsai has directed Taiwanese government officials to lock down her academic records until 2049.
    We appreciate your diligence to pursue this matter and look forward to know the truth.


  4. Dear Mr. Richardson :
    It seems that you will get the truth of this case from Information Commissioner Office. Maybe it would be interesting to see what would be the final outcome of this review.


    1. I have no information to inform me if an academic scandal has taken place, If Tsai dishonestly obtained a degree it would be a “big academic scandal” however without proof it will not develop into a major scandal. After the University of London secrecy has been ended we may know more. Thank you for the comment.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s